Tuesday, April 20, 2021

Nebraska Governor Uses Need for Mental Health as an Excuse to Promote Guns and Deny Immigrant Children Homes

Greetings, Governor P. Ricketts,

Recently you denied the President's request to help immigrant children and said those resources are needed for the state's own foster children and youth in rehabilitation programs. The next day you pledged to protect guns and said that restrictions were a bad idea and we just need to up mental health care.

If you ACTUALLY believe any of this, when are you announcing a huge initiative to make mental health resources and access free to ALL residents of Nebraska? 

I'll wait. 

Hello?

Oh dang, I waited so long for your mental health care initiatives, it looks like hell froze over in the meantime. 

Be honest (if you know how.) You have ZERO intention of addressing mental health in this state and are using it as an excuse and bald-headed lie so that you can dog-whistle to your base in your discrimination against immigrants and your protection to guns, guns, guns, (which are less regulated than wombs in Nebraska).

When in fact, everyone in Nebraska DOES need access and resources to mental health care and it WOULD help tremendously if you had the gall to do something about it, instead of just using it as an excuse to do or not do something.

But in order for these mental health resources to be effective, you also need to address the issues that are at the heart of the difficulties that cause people mental anguish. Here are a few I can think of at the moment: 

  • medical costs that bankrupt (Universal Health Care would solve that)
  • finances (raise the state/federal minimum wage to a living wage comparative to what it should be with inflation. $15 is a start, but should be more like $20+)
  • child care, maternity & paternity leave 
  • police brutality (hi, did you not just see 15 cases lumped together in Omaha and dismissed to let cops get away with shit like murdering people? That isn't justice. And body cam footage is supposed to be for the people to hold cops accountable, not for cops to hide behind new rules.)
  • The inequity for housing, school districts, etc. The list goes on and on.
So, if you want to deny immigrant children a place to live because you have racism and xenophobia on the brain (thought you were so pro-life, dude), and if you pander to gun-nuts because you want to make sure they don't point their guns on you, that's on you and your conscience. I judge you for it. You shouldn't be in public office because you don't serve the people. I also judge you for using the need for mental health as a reason for your bad calls when you have ZERO intention of doing anything about it. 

You should be ashamed for lots of reasons, including the concept that if this state honestly can't handle a few more children and caring for their mental health, we're a lot worse off than we should be and you should leave office and let some capable people that give a shit about the people of Nebraska step in and do the work you aren't willing to do. 

But I suppose you can always just make another prayer proclamation or else something else useless, like don a cowboy hat and lie about medical marijuana. 

Disappointed, As Always,


Context: 

Gov. Ricketts rejects request to house migrant children in Nebraska

Paul Hammel Apr 13, 2021  

https://omaha.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/gov-ricketts-rejects-request-to-house-migrant-children-in-nebraska/article_3eb981ca-9c69-11eb-b455-87f4e96d2e3f.html

LINCOLN — Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts on Tuesday rejected a request from the Biden administration to house displaced migrant children in the state.

Ricketts’ rejection comes five days after a fellow Republican, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, announced a similar denial. Both governors said it was Democratic President Joe Biden’s “problem,” and he should deal with it.

“President Biden has created an immigration crisis on our border with thousands of unaccompanied migrant children coming to our country without their parents or family,” Ricketts said. “Nebraska is declining their request because we are reserving our resources for serving our kids.”

“I do not want our kids harmed as the result of President Biden’s bad policies,” the Nebraska governor added.

Last month, the U.S. government picked up nearly 19,000 children traveling alone across the Mexican border. It’s the largest monthly number ever recorded, though Biden has said there have been similar surges in the past during the early spring.

“Sponsors” for the children, usually parents or close relatives already living in the U.S., are sought so the children can live with them while pursuing asylum cases in heavily backlogged federal immigration courts.

The huge increase in the number of children traveling alone — some as young as 3 — and families has severely strained border holding facilities, which aren’t supposed to hold people for more than three days but often do. It’s left the government scrambling to find space and hire staff to care for children longer term until they can be placed with sponsors.

Lazaro Arturo Spindola, executive director of the Nebraska Latino American Commission, said Tuesday that unaccompanied children coming to the U.S. dates back to the 1960s, when more than 14,000 children from Cuba came to the country via “Peter Pan” flights.

Spindola said the governor’s announcement “basically lacks a logical reason and humanity,” and repeats talking points of the Republican Party.

An official with Nebraska Appleseed, a Lincoln-based advocacy organization for the poor and immigrants, said the border surge was “cyclical” and is a crisis not for the U.S., but for the children and families seeking safety.

“We have the capacity and knowledge to coordinate an effective humanitarian response. The United States is capable of welcoming with dignity children, families, and adults seeking safety,” said Darcy Tromanhauser, immigrants and communities program director at Nebraska Appleseed.

Ricketts said that the Biden administration should work with Central American governments to “reunite the children with their families in their home countries instead of pursuing the risky strategy of scattering them across the United States.”

When asked what harm would come to Nebraska’s children, Ricketts provided this statement to The World-Herald:

“Nebraska is not positioned to provide the proper supports relative to the necessary trauma-informed care, wraparound services and housing that displaced migrant children would need,” he said. “Taking on this crisis, which was created by President Biden, would also shift Nebraska’s focus away from managing our foster care system and Youth Rehabilitation and Treatment Centers.”

This report includes material from the Associated Press.



Gov. Ricketts designates Nebraska as 'sanctuary state' for gun rights

Paul Hammel Apr 15, 2021 

https://omaha.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/gov-ricketts-designates-nebraska-as-sanctuary-state-for-gun-rights/article_e8e64502-9d3b-11eb-a063-4fca6c88eaf8.html 

LINCOLN — Doubling down on his pro-gun rights credentials, Gov. Pete Ricketts signed a symbolic proclamation Wednesday designating Nebraska as a “Second Amendment Sanctuary State.”

The proclamation comes as President Joe Biden recently announced a plan to address gun violence.

A growing number of Nebraska counties have adopted similar “sanctuary” resolutions. A bill also is pending in the Nebraska Legislature to allow counties to opt out of the state requirement that gun owners register and take a gun safety course to carry concealed weapons.

“The White House and U.S. Congress have announced their intention to pursue measures that would infringe on the right to keep and bear arms,” Ricketts stated in the proclamation. “Nebraska will stand up against federal overreach and attempts to regulate gun ownership and use in the Good Life.”

“Second Amendment sanctuary” refers to a declaration that a state, county or city will not enforce federal gun laws they consider to be too restrictive. At least four states, including neighboring Kansas and Wyoming, have declared themselves “sanctuary states.”

In Nebraska, at least 50 counties, including Buffalo, Hall, Platte and Gage Counties, have passed sanctuary resolutions in recent months, and similar measures are being considered in at least seven other counties, according to the Nebraska Firearms Owners Association.

Biden recently announced plans to ban the sale of so-called “ghost guns,” which are firearms that can be assembled with kits and cannot be traced by law enforcement. He’s also asked the Justice Department to draft model “red flag” laws that states could adopt. Red flag laws, like one enacted in Colorado, allow judges to order the confiscation of guns from someone who is exhibiting mental health issues or threatening behavior. The president also wants stepped-up community efforts to discourage gun violence.

Ricketts, who also spoke at National Rifle Association’s convention in 2018, has consistently opposed steps to impose stricter gun laws, saying that better mental health care and improved law enforcement are the keys to preventing mass shootings.

A representative of Nebraskans Against Gun Violence noted that the governor’s proclamation comes one day after Ricketts refused to offer “sanctuary” to unaccompanied migrant children who are showing up at the U.S.-Mexico border in record numbers.

“This decree is meant to placate those that are avid gun rights activists while shunning children that are seeking refuge,” often from gun violence, said Melody Vaccaro of the gun-control group. “Gun violence is a public health crisis and we support serious funding of research, proven community programming, and using a combination of education, policy, and accountability to reduce (it).”

Legislative Bill 236, introduced by State Sen. Tom Brewer of Gordon and prioritized by Sen. Robert Clements of Elmwood, would give counties the power to allow “permitless” carry of concealed firearms. Currently, gun owners must obtain a state permit and pass a firearm course before being allowing to carry a concealed gun.

LB 236 awaits first-round debate in the Legislature.

Another Nebraska gun rights proposal, LB 188 or the “Second Amendment Preservation Act,” would prohibit the State Patrol or local law enforcement officials from enforcing any new federal restrictions on firearms. That bill, which did not receive a priority designation, has not advanced from a legislative committee.


Friday, April 2, 2021

Nebraska Senators Fearful of Comprehensive Fact-Based Sex Education

REFERENCE:  https://journalstar.com/news/local/education/senators-object-to-proposed-nebraska-sex-education-standards/article_777126b5-2377-5dd9-b72a-b4eba9f4c34c.html?fbclid=IwAR0d0UwuFU0CCVPyARUh1CtPg1JSqyR694DSRU7ux9afX-J9Hokdcd5vpgk  


Greetings, Senator X,

I was very disappointed to see your name listed as one of several Senators who opposes the potential sex education updates. The fact that so many Senators are opposed to the proper education of our youth is upsetting, but not surprising. In fact, it proves to me why this change in education is so important.

When Governor P. Ricketts tried to scare people to speak out against it, I went to the NE Education site as he prompted and examined the document on projected Health Education. Contrary to his expectations and scaremongering, I found it to be quite inclusive, important, and age-appropriate. I wrote to the Governor and those in charge of the proposed changes and let both parties know as much.

First of all, the document was created with input from educators across the state and with advice from doctors, psychologists and other behavioral and mental health experts, not scary "political activists" as Ricketts tried to frighten people. Secondly, the health standards are not mandatory, but are guidelines so schools can adjust as needed.

I thought that the lesson plans did a great job because they relied on facts and information about what children may be noticing or experiencing about their world. For young children, I noticed a lesson about different family structures, like adoptive parents, or same sex parents, or divorced parents, etc. There's no reason to hide this information, as some students live in families divergent from "mom, dad, kids". Children should understand there is no shame in these families, and should learn to not shame their friends who have different situations. This allows children to be knowledgeable and care about each other. 

Likewise, children learning about the different people in this world helps them to understand we ALL have a right to be acknowledged and respected. This most definitely includes LGBTQ+ people. To think that children shouldn't know about this very important aspect of human sexuality is absurd. To treat it like something that should be hidden, or something shameful IS THE SHAMEFUL ASPECT. A good percentage of children already know someone who is LGBTQ+ or will meet someone who is or WILL REALIZE THEY ARE part of the LGBTQ+ grouping. To NOT give children factual and supportive information is detrimental to EVERYONE. 

How many youth have been bullied or had to hide who they were, even from their own families? How many have attempted suicide or self-harm? When we deny youth information about facts or information, we are denying them to be who they are AND denying them the resources to become strong supportive people who accept the differences of others. 

If Senators can't wrap their heads around the existence of LGBTQ+ people and their responsibility to protect their LGBTQ+ constituents, I should think they should spend some time with these lesson plans, as it would make them more mindful of their duties and who they represent. Denying education is absurd. 

To think that parents should be the source of information on these issues, as Ricketts promoted, is also absurd. If parents have bias and hatred and ignorance, they will be examples of that to their children and the cycle continues. Having scientific facts about our varied society in the classroom is essential. Imagine a child who feels "different". They hear all the time about how their parent hates [insert awful words here]. This child feels shame, and fear, and unloved. Imagine this same child hears in school that it's fine to be different, and it's perfectly normal to be non-heterosexual. This child has been empowered. This child has hope that there are adults they can turn to for support and information because their parents lack education, information, and perspective. 

Another important aspect I noticed is younger children learning the appropriate names for genitalia and learning about who is allowed to touch their bodies and how. There is no age limit for sexual abuse of children. If this information was left out of education so that "parents can talk about it"... can you imagine what happens to a child who is being abused by a family member? They don't have supportive people in the education system who can tell them what is happening to them is wrong or who can help them be removed from that harmful situation. Schools can be a place of protection for youth and they need to know that adults aren't afraid to be there for them and talk about these scary things and get help.

My own education in Nebraska was in Catholic school for K-12 and I had to rise above so much misinformation and ignorance in their sex education programs to get where I am today. I'm not the only one. It's a talking point among my family and friends how the sex education system failed us and gave us shame and misinformation. And at age 12, I already knew people who were LGBTQ+ and wish I had been given a better education to be more supportive and knowledgeable back then. If we can fix the education system so that there is less of a struggle for facts, information, and support, we must do it now, and the proposed lesson plans do this. The time for fear-mongering and handwringing is gone. We must rely upon facts and understanding to make Nebraska a more safe, welcoming, and educated place. 

I am very passionate about LGBTQ+ people being honored and supported and protected because they exist among my family and among my friends. Even if they weren't among those I love, I can't stand the idea that lawmakers in the year 2021 STILL want people to be ashamed of who they are. If that's the case, those people need to step down. This state, this country, this world is for EVERYONE. Ignoring these people doesn't mean that kids will never meet them or learn about them or BECOME them. Denying this part of our humanity is dangerous. 

To neglect the factual information about varying genders or sexualities is to neglect reality and to neglect the youth. Not providing this information as part of lesson plans will in fact lead to heightened problems with depression, suicide, abuse, and more. Everything is connected.

I need for anyone who doesn't "understand" LGBTQ+ people to find a way to learn about it and understand that they are every bit worthy of the human rights they have. 

THERE IS NO AGE TOO YOUNG to introduce these ideas because these children ALREADY KNOW. They already have LGBTQ+ people among their family and their friends, and may already feel different themselves. If there is a fear of "normalizing" this, then the problem is the fear itself. It's already "normal" to be different. Have you heard the idea that if black children already know about racism at a young age, then white children should too? Same concept. We get stronger together with facts, information, support, and truth.

We need to empower and strengthen our youth to recognize these differences in themselves and others, to not carry the shame put upon them by the ignorant, and to protect and support each other. I find that this knowledge-based health and sexuality plan for Nebraska schools does just that, and is very necessary for the citizens of our state to rise from fear and ignorance and embrace inclusivity, facts, education, and progress.  

Sincerely,

X